CX014 - Metodologia na Pesquisa Biomédica - 1S/2025 Imprimir

Ementa:

Uma breve visão geral do conceito de ciência, especialmente na área biomédica. Comparação das ciências biomédicas e das ciências exatas. Principais tipos de investigação: estudos experimentais e pesquisa clínica. Níveis de evidência. Associação e causalidade. Como planejar e escrever um artigo: pesquisa bibliográfica, hipótese científica, criação de modelos. Desenho do estudo: escolha de grupos, estudo retrospectivo e prospectivo, importância do planejamento científico. Análise uni- e multivariada. Machine learning e o uso da inteligência artificial. Aspectos éticos na pesquisa com humanos e animais. Comunicação científica: apresentação oral e pôster em congressos. Diferentes formas de artigos científicos. Erros comuns em escrita científica. Avaliação da ciência:análise crítica de artigos, revisão por pares, ranking de revistas, Science citation index, métricas em ciência. Agências de fomento. A crise de reprodutibilidade em ciência e o aumento das más práticas. Revistas predatórial e “paper mills”. Problemas com “large language model”.

Bibliografia:

• Altman, DG the scandal of poor medical-research BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 308 Edição: 6924 : 283-284 1994
• Amaral, O B. et al The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative ELIFE 8 artigo: e41602 Publicado: FEB 5 2019
• Baker, M IS THERE A REPRODUCIBILITY CRISIS? : NATURE 7604 452-454 DOI: 10.1038/533452a 2016
• Begley, CG; Ioannidis JPA Reproducibility in Science Improving the Standard for Basic and Preclinical Research CIRCULATION RESEARCH 16: 116-126 JAN 2 2015 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303819
• Button, KS. et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE 14 365-376 2013
• Cowel, JM. Publication Ethics: Plagiarism, Self-Plagiarism, Duplicate Publication, and Piecemeal Publication JOURNAL OF SCHOOL NURSING 33 : 7-7 FEB 2017
• Fedak KM, Bernal A, Capshaw ZA, Gross S. Applying the Bradford Hill criteria in the 21st century: how data integration has changed causal inference in molecular epidemiology. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2015 12:14. doi: 10.1186/s12982-015-0037-4. eCollection 2015.
• Greenhalg T.How to read a paper - Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL Volume: 315 Edição: 7110 Páginas: 740-743 Publicado: SEP 20 1997
• Halsey, Lewis G.; Curran-Everett, Douglas; Vowler, Sarah L.; et al. The fickle P value generates irreproducible result. NATURE METHODS 12 179-185 2015
• Hesselmann F; et al The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles .CURRENT SOCIOLOGY : 65 s: 814-845 2017
• Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
• Ioannidis JPA. Evolution and Translation of Research Findings: From Bench to Where?PLoS Clin Trials. 2006 November; 1(7): e36. Published online 2006 November 17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010036
• Ioannidis JPA, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher D, Schulz KF, Tibshirani R. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014 383, 9912, Pages 166–175.2014
• Liberati A , Altman DG , et al. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration PLoS Med. 2009 July; 6(7): e1000100. Published online 2009 July 21. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
• Milkowski, M , Hensel, WM Hohol, M Replicability or reproducibility? On the replication crisis in computational neuroscience and sharing only relevant detail J COMPUT NEUROSCIENCE 2018,45: 163-172DOI: 10.1007/s10827-018-0702- :
• Mills M. Publication ethics – What do we need to know? Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 2019;20:17-5 2019
• Travers M et al Should this systematic review and meta-analysis change my practice? Part 1: exploring treatment effect and trustworthiness BRIT J SPORTS MED 2019; 53:1488-1492
• Zari DA, Goodman SN, Kimmelman J. Harms From Uninformative Clinical Trials JAMA 322: 813-814 SEP 3 2019 Wilson P. Unsolicited solicitations: identifying characteristics of unsolicited emails from potentially predatory journals and the role of librarians. J Med Librarian Ass 2022;110:520-524.
• Holly Else and Richard Van Noorden. The Battle Against paper mills. Nature 2021; 591: 516-519
• Metze K et al. Bibliographic research with large language model ChatGPT 4: instability, hallucinations and sometimes alerts. Clinics, in press.
• Metze K. Bureaucrats, researchers, editors, and the impact factor - a vicious circle that is detrimental to science. Clinics 2010;65(10):937-940

Ano de Catálogo: 2025

Créditos: 4